Does English Law Go Far Enough In Giving Special Privileges To Journalists Who Wish To Protect Their Sources Of Information?

: Does English fair play go far complete in giving special privileges to journalists who wish to nurse their extension of disciplineJournalists often rely on informants who atomic number 18 insiders in the organizations which the journalists are analyse . If the usual absorb winding in informing the public about certain matters is genuine , such informers may be said to be playacting in public interest but they would still be held liable nether justice for breach of confidence and eventide criminal law . thence , if the public interest social function of the press is to flourish , it is master(prenominal) that their informants should not discouraged from providing information and for this land up , the press has primarily followed the practice of refusing to disclose the source of their information . This essay ex amines whether the English law provides sufficient safeguards for journalists who wish to protect their source of informationIn attorney popular v .

Mulholland , Attorney General v parent ,journalists declined to answer questions which involved naming their sources during the head into operation of the liege lord spy ring The journalists where convicted in contempt proceedings under section 1 (2 ) of the Tribunals of doubtfulness (Evidence ) Act 1921 and both the broad(prenominal) Court and Court of Appeal rejected the journalists claim that they are entitled to keep their sources secret . and so common law recognized no privilege for journalists to ! refuse to reveal their sources and they could be imprisoned and fined for contempt of court if they refused to travel along with an to reveal sourcesHowever...If you need to get a full essay, ordain it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper